Take Action Home >

Save Our Dogs From Inhumane Debarking Procedures

567 signatures toward our 30,000 Goal

1.89% Complete

Sponsor: The Animal Rescue Site

Our dogs deserve to communicate naturally without enduring the pain and suffering caused by debarking. Join us to end this inhumane practice!


Debarking, also known as devocalization, is a surgical procedure intended to reduce a dog's ability to bark. This invasive surgery permanently alters a dog's vocal cords, causing significant health risks and emotional distress1. Dogs bark to communicate their needs, emotions, and warnings. Removing this essential behavior compromises their quality of life and their ability to interact naturally with their environment2.

Surgical Methods

The procedure involves either an oral approach or a laryngotomy3. The oral method is less invasive but often less effective, leading to potential respiratory issues due to scar tissue formation4. The laryngotomy approach provides better access to the vocal cords but is more invasive and costly, increasing the risk of complications such as chronic coughing, gagging, and aspiration pneumonia1.

Debarking does not address the underlying causes of excessive barking, such as anxiety, boredom, or territorial behavior5. Instead, it merely silences the symptom, leaving the dog's emotional and behavioral needs unmet. Experts warn that the procedure is often ineffective, with many dogs regaining their normal bark within months, necessitating additional surgeries1.

Health Risks

The legal landscape around debarking is tightening. States like Massachusetts, Maryland, and New Jersey have banned the procedure except in medically necessary cases as determined by a licensed veterinarian4. Other states, including Pennsylvania, California, and Rhode Island, have placed restrictions to prevent the non-essential debarking of dogs, reflecting a growing consensus on the unethical nature of this practice1.

Veterinary Opposition

Veterinary organizations largely oppose debarking. The American Animal Hospital Association and the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association condemn non-therapeutic devocalization due to its detrimental effects on animal welfare4. They emphasize that debarking deprives dogs of their natural communication methods and poses significant health risks, making it an unacceptable practice in modern veterinary care1.

Humane Alternatives

Humane alternatives to debarking exist and should be prioritized. Proper training, increased exercise, and environmental enrichment are effective methods to manage excessive barking without causing harm5. Behavioral modification techniques, such as positive reinforcement and desensitization, address the root causes of barking, promoting a healthier and happier relationship between dogs and their owners2.

Compassion and Responsibility

Compassion and humanity must guide our approach to animal care. Dogs are sentient beings with the right to express themselves naturally. Debarking undermines this right and inflicts unnecessary suffering, contradicting the principles of responsible pet ownership and veterinary ethics3.

Take Action Now

By signing this petition, you advocate for the ethical treatment of dogs and support the American Veterinary Medical Association in banning non-medically necessary debarking procedures. Your action will help ensure that veterinary practices prioritize animal welfare, uphold humane standards, and promote a future where all dogs can live without unnecessary suffering5.

Join us in protecting our beloved pets from harmful surgical procedures. Sign the petition today and stand up for a compassionate and ethical future for all dogs.

More on this issue:

  1. Soo Kim, Newsweek (13 May 2022), "What Is Debarking a Dog and Why It Should Be Illegal, According to Experts."
  2. Texas A&M Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences. (10 April 2014), "Alternatives to Debarking Surgery."
  3. Charlotte McGowan, National Animal Interest Alliance (8 January 2012), "Debarking (Bark Softening) - Myths and Facts."
  4. American Veterinary Medical Association (7 March 2023), "Literature review on the welfare implications of  Canine devocalization."
  5. Humane Society Veterinary Medical Association, "Humane Society Veterinary Medical Association Devocalization Fact Sheet."
To Top

The Petition:

To the American Veterinary Medical Association,

We, the undersigned, respectfully urge the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) to take a strong stand against the practice of debarking, also known as devocalization, by rescinding accreditation from any veterinary facility that performs this procedure on dogs except in cases deemed medically necessary by a licensed veterinarian.

Debarking is an invasive surgical procedure that permanently alters a dog's vocal cords, significantly impacting their ability to communicate. This procedure not only poses severe health risks, including chronic pain, respiratory complications, and increased stress, but it also infringes upon the natural behaviors and well-being of our canine companions.

Humanity and compassion must guide our approach to animal care. Dogs bark as a means of communication, expressing emotions such as fear, excitement, and the need for attention. Removing this essential aspect of their behavior undermines their quality of life and the human-animal bond. Instead of resorting to surgical modifications, we advocate for humane, non-invasive methods to manage excessive barking, such as training, behavioral therapy, and environmental enrichment. These alternatives respect the animal's natural behaviors and promote their mental and physical health without causing harm.

By taking decisive action against non-medically necessary debarking procedures, the AVMA will lead the way in ensuring ethical treatment of animals, fostering trust between veterinarians and pet owners, and promoting a future where all dogs can live healthy, happy lives without unnecessary suffering. This commitment to animal welfare will reinforce the values of compassion and responsibility within the veterinary profession and society as a whole.

We believe that banning non-essential debarking procedures is a crucial step towards a more humane and ethical approach to animal care. We urge the AVMA to prioritize the well-being of animals by eliminating support for practices that cause harm and do not address the underlying behavioral issues.

Together, we can ensure a better future for all animals, uphold the highest standards of veterinary care, and promote a society that values and protects the natural behaviors and well-being of our beloved pets.

Sincerely,

To Top

Signatures: